Field Work Term Evaluation, Reflection, and Assessment

Field Work Term Capacities

One of the core educational structures at Bennington College—the Field Work Term—provides students a relational platform for integrating classroom study with work in the world. Throughout their varied experiences in the Field Work Term, students will progress in their capacity: to develop a course of critical inquiry and innovative problem solving; to advance a set of research skills; to create a sense of leadership and personal initiative; to engage colleagues and community through collaboration and an awareness of multiple perspectives; and to communicate effectively through informed writing and verbal expression. The Bennington capacities framework aligns with nationally recognized work-readiness competencies, and together serve as a foundation for student reflection and assessing a student’s work.

 

    Field Work Term Evaluation and Reflection

    A student’s final Field Work Term (FWT) assessment is based on adherence to due dates, supervisor evaluation(s), meeting the required number of work hours, completing quality reflective assignments, and compliance with the Field Work Term student-employer agreement.

    Adherence to Field Work Term Due Dates

    FWT is an opportunity for students to experience the world of work and to be evaluated on their performance based on how the professional world operates. For this reason, FWT due dates for site applications and profile setup on Handshake, registration, reflective essay submission, evaluations, and time sheets are firm, and students will be held accountable to these dates. If due dates are missed, a final FWT assessment may be adversely affected.

    Digital Profile and Resume

    As Handshake is the College's resource to connect students to prospective employers, it is essential that students learn to present their professional and life experience in a compelling way. With this in mind, all students are required to set up a profile on Handshake and to upload their professional resume for review and feedback by the FWT team.

    Student Evaluations by FWT Employers

    Written evaluations of student performance are required from all FWT supervisors for primary jobs. These evaluations become part of a student’s permanent academic record and are considered in a student’s final FWT evaluation. Late or poor evaluations may adversely affect a student’s FWT assessment.

    Required Hours

    Students are required to complete 210 hours of work. Students can work all of the 210 hours at up to two primary sites, or have the option to use 70 hours towards a supplemental position at a secondary site.

    Self-Evaluation

    First year students: Given all first year students write a reflective essay incorporating aspects of FWT learning, first year students are exempt from answering the reflective essay questions below. Instead all students do not need to write an essay, but are required to fill out a self-evaluation survey asking questions about work competency development over Field Work Term. To access the self-evaluation, login to Handshake, click "Experiences" under the "Career Center" upper menu tab, find your current FWT registration and click "View Details," then click "Submit an Evaluation" in the upper right tab. Detailed instructions and a preview of survey questions are available here. The survey is due February 8.

    Returning students: FWT provides the opportunity to consider your work and growth in the transition from student to professional. The FWT reflection allows you to unpack your FWT experience and examine it in relation to your evolving goals, academic inquiries, and emerging professional identity.

    Returning students submit responses to four required reflective essay questions via this Google Form. You will be asked to answer each of the questions below with a maximum of 300 words (one paragraph per question), showing your ability to refine and condense your thoughts to present key ideas clearly and succinctly. Your answers to these questions will be shared with your academic advisors.

    • What did FWT teach you about yourself and your strengths in the working world? 
    • How did the field work experience help expand or re-shape your pursuits and interests?
    • What core values guide the work you do? Were you able to work in alignment with those values over FWT? Why/why not?
    • In what areas did you experience the greatest growth in your personal and professional development? Provide one or two examples of new skills/knowledge that you acquired and how.

    Student Conduct

    Behavior in violation of the FWT Student Employer Agreement may adversely affect a student’s FWT assessment, depending on the circumstances. In rare cases, behavior may also result in disciplinary action if in conflict with the policies outlined in the Bennington College Handbook.

     

    Field Work Term Assessment

    Based on the evaluation criteria outlined above, a student will receive an assessment of “Pass,” “Marginal Pass,” “Fail,” or “Incomplete” for FWT.

    A FWT final assessment, FWT job title, and the name of the site will appear on a student’s academic transcript. All supervisor evaluations will become part of the student’s permanent academic file. Supervisor evaluations do not accompany a transcript unless specified when requesting a transcript from the Dean’s Office. If a student does not annually receive a “Pass” or “Marginal Pass” for FWT, they are required to make up the requirement, usually during the summer. FWT makeups must be successfully completed before approval for graduation can be given.

    • Pass – Denotes that a student has satisfactorily met all FWT assessment criteria.
    • Marginal Pass – Acknowledges that a student has met the FWT requirements for the year, but has not satisfactorily met all FWT assessment criteria.
    • Fail – Signifies that a student has unsatisfactorily met a critical portion of the assessment criteria. A FWT Fail assessment remains part of a student’s academic file and official transcript. Failure to successfully complete an FWT can adversely influence a student’s academic status. The associate dean of the College will determine the impact of a failed assessment on a student’s academic standing. Students who are issued a Fail assessment are given two weeks within which they may contact the FWT Office if they wish to contest their assessment.
    • Incomplete – Students with medical, personal, or family-related issues may be granted an incomplete, allowing them to fulfill the FWT requirement over the summer without academic penalty. Students who complete at least half of their required hours may be eligible for a half incomplete. The FWT director determines this assessment on a case-by-case basis. Students who wish to be considered for an incomplete or half incomplete should contact the FWT director as early as possible. A half incomplete refers to hours completed only. Students granted a half incomplete at the discretion of the FWT director are required to provide a reflective project and employer evaluation for hours completed in the winter and summer.

    The following are examples of the conditions under which a student may be eligible for an incomplete if they remain in immediate, regular contact with the FWT Office:

    • Medical Emergency: Students requesting a medical incomplete will be asked to submit paperwork—including a doctor’s note of necessity—for a medical withdrawal and may be asked to provide clearance information for spring reentry. Only urgent medical issues are considered.
    • Personal/Family Issues: Such issues might include a terminally ill family member or a recent death in the family.
    • Employer/Housing Issues: Though it is extremely rare, students are occasionally granted an incomplete due to unforeseen employer/housing circumstances. In such cases, a student must pursue a backup job search approved by the FWT Office.
    • Workplace concern issues: Such issues might include alleged harassment or discrimination, feeling of unsafety, or being unable to complete an FWT due to inappropriate or inadequate supervision.